I’ve previously written about the fear that our current AI may be incapable of truly original thought, and that anything we’re seeing that may appear as such is really just algorithmic anomalies that we don’t understand.
MG writes about this as if the notion that AI is incapable of original thought is the fringe argument. But we have studies that prove this. It’s the idea that AI can “think” at all that’s the radical, unproven notion.